Senate Majority leader presses nuclear option button; Gorsuch nomination advances

The U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C. (Photo credit: Wally Gobetz via Flickr / Creative Commons)

The political war that has raged on Capitol Hill since Inauguration Day reached new heights Thursday with a pitched parliamentary battle on the Senate floor. After jumping through a series of procedural hoops, the GOP ultimately advanced Judge Neil Gorsuch toward the U.S. Supreme Court bench – altering checks and balances on partisan power along the way. FSRN’s Reaux Packard has more.

Download Audio

Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell invoked the so-called nuclear option Thursday, changing the interpretation of Senate rules to allow a simple majority to end a filibuster of a U.S. Supreme Court nominee. The brute force parliamentary move, in this case, allows the GOP to sidestep Democrats’ opposition to President Donald Trump’s nominee, but could permanently alter the balance of powers in the Senate.

The historic action came after Democrats filibustered Supreme Court nominee, Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Neil Gorsuch, and Republicans failed to garner the 60 votes needed to end the debate.

“Our Democratic colleagues have done something today that is unprecedented in the history of the Senate. Unfortunately, it has brought us to this point,” McConnell said. “We need to restore the norms and traditions of the Senate and get past this unprecedented partisan filibuster. Therefore, I raise a point of order that the vote on closure under the precedent set on November 21, 2013, is a majority vote on all nominations.”

And with that, a series of votes began that culminated with the rule change and 51 votes were all that was necessary to end the filibuster.

In the short term, the rule change means that by Friday night the Senate can proceed to what is expected to be a party-line vote on the controversial nominee.

But in the long view, the move hands ultimate control of the High Court confirmations to the majority party in the Senate, removing any need for compromise or bipartisan cooperation when naming occupants to the Supreme Court bench.

For decades, the 60-vote rule in the Senate has ensured that the minority party still had substantial sway over political appointees and legislation.

That began to change in 2013, after the GOP repeatedly blocked action on a multitude of former President Obama’s nominees. Then-Majority Leader, Democrat Harry Reid, used the nuclear option to open a pathway to their approval, saying the Republicans were employing a pattern of obstruction that the founders never intended.

And when Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia died in February of 2016, the Republican leadership raised the obstruction bar another rung – steadfastly refusing to even grant a Judiciary Committee hearing to Obama’s nominee, D.C. Circuit Chief Judge Merrick Garland.

At a press conference ahead of the vote, Democrats cited the Garland nomination and decried the more than $10 million dollars in dark money spent by The Heritage Foundation and The Federalist Society to advocate for Gorsuch’s nomination. And Connecticut Senator Dick Blumenthal said that Gorsuch had an obligation to be forthcoming, given his nomination by a president who made litmus test promises about his nominee.

“He evaded, he dodged, he refused to answer. Do you believe that Brown v. Board of Education was correctly decided? Do you believe that Griswold v. Connecticut was correctly decided? Do you believe that Loving v. Virginia, Lawrence v. Texas, or Obergefell v. Hodges? These are not new decisions, some of them are decades old, they are well-established, long accepted, core constitutional cases,” Blumenthal said. “He evaded our questions at every turn, about those cases, about fundamental rights and liberties that are a matter of core constitutional principle.”

Despite repeated attempts by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer to delay the nuclear option vote, GOP lawmakers were determined to advance the controversial measure. The nuclear option is the most drastic of the measures taken so far to secure confirmation for a Trump nominee facing party line votes. But unlike cabinet members, Supreme Court Justice appointments are for life.

You may also like...